<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A High-Throughput Path Metric for Multi-Hop Wireless Routing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.sanmathi.org/nalanda/2008/10/07/a-high-throughput-path-metric-for-multi-hop-wireless-routing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/nalanda/2008/10/07/a-high-throughput-path-metric-for-multi-hop-wireless-routing/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashima Atul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/nalanda/2008/10/07/a-high-throughput-path-metric-for-multi-hop-wireless-routing/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashima Atul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sanmathi.org/nalanda/?p=154#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I agree about your point regarding the probe packets. The probe packets sent are of fixed size at an average rate of T and do not depict the same loss rate that the data packets may face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about your point regarding the probe packets. The probe packets sent are of fixed size at an average rate of T and do not depict the same loss rate that the data packets may face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

