Comments for Stake Five

Comment on Memory-sensitive Caching for CF by Michael Horne

Michael Horne — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:27:01 +0000

Thanks for this - I needed a caching solution that effectively took care of itself and the JVM, and along came SoftReference I’ve adapted your code and added to it

Comment on HOWTO: Call CF from the command line by Ahamad

Ahamad — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:44:46 +0000

Hi,
I have posted a simple example on onMissingmethod here.

http://cf-examples.net/index.cfm/2008/8/25/onMissingMethod-Example

Comment on Memory-sensitive Caching for CF by John Allen

John Allen — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:56:13 +0000

DUDE! THIS SAVES MY DAY/MONTH!!!!
Thank you.
John Allen

Comment on HOWTO: Call CF from the command line by Javier Julio

Javier Julio — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:27:35 +0000

Unfortunately, it does not work. Sorry I have replied so late. I thought I had made my comment elsewhere. I meant to say “method” in the previous comment by the way instead of “message”.

I’ve set the onMissingMethod function to both remote and public but I’ll still get a CF error saying my method was not found.

Is it possible that this could be added in via an updater or maybe the next release of CF? It’s a great addition to be able to call CFC methods directly via the URL. I love this CURL example since everyone here at my job uses it to interact with the services we build.

Comment on HOWTO: Call CF from the command line by Ashwin

Ashwin — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:26:24 +0000

Javier - if I remember right, onMissingMethod will work fine, just so long as you provide a method name to invoke via the ‘method’ attribute on the URL; a plain URL without a method attribute may fail. Try it and do let me know how it works out. Sorry I can’t provide a definitive answer - it’s been over 6 months since I last looked at the CF source code!

Comment on HOWTO: Call CF from the command line by Javier Julio

Javier Julio — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:02:34 +0000

@Ashwin

I’ve set up a sample CFC to test out this feature and it works great. I’ve noticed that if an Application.cfm or Application.cfc (with onRequestStart) exists those files/functions are called. I was wondering then if onMissingMethod would fire if I did not type in a message in the query string?

Comment on CF8: Of Star Wars, Layer Cake and CFAJAXPROXY by Waarborg

Waarborg — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:32:49 +0000

I was looking for some information about interfacing with del.icio.us web services. And I stumbled on this website. I found more info than I need for now, so I bookmarked this page for future reference. Keep up the good work! See you soon.

Comment on Why I Like Spry by Ashwin

Ashwin — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:38:48 +0000

Depends on what you want to achieve, Michael - I think Spry and the new ColdFusion 8 AJAX tags offer solutions for almost all needs a normal AJAX application will need. However, if you need to customize application behaviour in highly specialized ways (e.g., control particular animations, transparencies, etc.) then something like Dojo, Prototype, or MooTools might be a better choice.

Comment on Why I Like Spry by michael

michael — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:16:36 +0000

so now there is a dojo 1.0 and spry 1.6 do you still think it’s a better method ?

I am looking at both at the current time, Dojo seems to be a little more comprehensive but far more work to get the job done. Spry seems to be a little more straight forward. but I have only been looking at them for a week now.

Comment on New ColdFusion blogs by Ashwin

Ashwin — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:35:46 +0000

Admittedly, I have a strong bias… But yes, I think CF8 is definitely worth the upgrade. It is one of the most feature-rich releases of CF ever, with something for just about everyone.