<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standardizing Privacy Policies</title>
	<link>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/ashwin/2006/09/11/standardizing-privacy-policies/</link>
	<description>Ashwin's musings on technology, music and just about anything else...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Stake Five :: Privacy and Identity - IGF workshop outcomes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/ashwin/2006/09/11/standardizing-privacy-policies/#comment-122</link>
		<author>Stake Five :: Privacy and Identity - IGF workshop outcomes</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 13:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/ashwin/2006/09/11/standardizing-privacy-policies/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>[...] Looks like there are folks getting things done in the privacy space, especially with regards to standardizing privacy policies, something that I think would be a great enabler for business on the Net. My 2c: better, and more easily, informed consumers are happier consumers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Looks like there are folks getting things done in the privacy space, especially with regards to standardizing privacy policies, something that I think would be a great enabler for business on the Net. My 2c: better, and more easily, informed consumers are happier consumers. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashwin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/ashwin/2006/09/11/standardizing-privacy-policies/#comment-121</link>
		<author>ashwin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/ashwin/2006/09/11/standardizing-privacy-policies/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>I would have to disagree with you re: complexity of CC. It's a few very simple licenses, and the basic &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://creativecommons.org/license/"&gt;license selection page&lt;/a&gt; on the CC site which helps with license selection is &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; easy to use. The other kinds of licenses - public domain, sampling, whatever - are also fairly straightforward and easy to understand, at least in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to disagree with you re: complexity of CC. It&#8217;s a few very simple licenses, and the basic <a target="_blank" href="http://creativecommons.org/license/">license selection page</a> on the CC site which helps with license selection is <em>really</em> easy to use. The other kinds of licenses - public domain, sampling, whatever - are also fairly straightforward and easy to understand, at least in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James  Governor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/ashwin/2006/09/11/standardizing-privacy-policies/#comment-120</link>
		<author>James  Governor</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.sanmathi.org/ashwin/2006/09/11/standardizing-privacy-policies/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I am a huge fan of the CC. but - even there, complexity can cause problems for people. its not one license, its a few licenses - there are those that argue the CC is therefore too hard to use. i need to check out privacy bird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge fan of the CC. but - even there, complexity can cause problems for people. its not one license, its a few licenses - there are those that argue the CC is therefore too hard to use. i need to check out privacy bird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
